Can deviant Muslims be the wali (for marriage) of their daughters if she is a Muslim with correct aqeedah?  For example, can a Muslim person who does not accept that hadith (Sunnah) need to be followed be the wali of a person who accepts Islaam (Qur'an and Sunnah)?
Praise be to Allaah.
The scholars (may Allaah have mercy on them) mentioned
 the conditions for being a woman’s wali (guardian) for marriage. Some
 of these conditions are agreed upon, and others are disputed. The conditions
 that are agreed upon are:  
1.    
 Islam
Ibn Quddamah said: The kaafir cannot be the wali of a
 Muslim woman, according to the consensus of the scholars.
A similar view was also narrated from Ibn al-Mundhir.
 (al-Mughni, 7/356) 
2.    
 Being of sound mind. 
3.    
 Majority (having reached puberty)  
4.    
 Being male.
Ibn Rushd said: (The scholars) agreed that among the
 conditions of guardianship are: being Muslim, being an adult and being
 male.
Bidaayat al-Mujtahid,
 2/12
Ibn Qudaamah said: Being male is a condition of guardianship
 according to all (the scholars). (al-Mughni, 7/356) 
The conditions concerning which the scholars disputed
 are:  
1.    
 Being free
The condition of being free is listed by most of the
 scholars; the Hanafis were of a different view.
The basis of describing freedom as a condition is that
 a slave has no power of guardianship over himself, so it is more likely
 that he cannot have the power of guardianship over anyone else.
(See the two references mentioned above)
2.    
 Being of good character
Imaam al-Shaafa'i and Imaam Ahmad were of the view that
 this is one of the conditions of guardianship.
What is meant by good character is appearing to be of
 good character. It is not necessary for the wali to be of good character
 both outwardly and inwardly. Such a requirement would be too difficult
 and would lead to most marriages being invalid. (Khashshaaf al-Qinaa’, 3/30)  
It is important to note that the questioner may want
 to marry the woman, then if he discusses some issues with her guardian
 and they have an argument, he might accuse him of not believing in referring
 to the Qur’aan and Sunnah. This would be overstepping the mark and a
 major sin, because it is accusing a Muslim of something that would put
 him beyond the pale of Islam. 
But if the wife’s guardian really does not believe in
 the Sunnah, like that group which calls itself al-Qur’aaniyyeen, then
 he should argue with him, explain the truth to him, dispel his confusion
 and establish proof against him. Then if he persists he is a kaafir,
 and it is not permissible for him to be the guardian of a Muslim woman
 for marriage even if she is his daughter. He forfeits the right of guardianship,
 which then passes to the closest Muslim relative of the woman. And Allah
 knows best.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment